ACR TI-RADS Calculator

Pick the ultrasound feature in each of the five ACR TI-RADS categories. Points are summed to a TR level, and the nodule's largest dimension decides between fine-needle aspiration, ultrasound follow-up or nothing. The result updates as you go.

Disclaimer:

Implements the ACR TI-RADS white paper (Tessler 2017) and chart. Not a substitute for local biopsy policy. Provided "as is" without warranty of any kind, express or implied, including accuracy, completeness or fitness for a particular purpose. For educational purposes only. The user is solely responsible for verifying results against the source guideline and for all clinical decisions.

Echogenic foci – choose all that apply (none or large comet-tail artifacts = 0)
mm

How it works

ACR TI-RADS assigns points in five categories and sums them. Spongiform nodules score 0 and take no further points; a mixed nodule is scored on its solid component; if composition cannot be judged because of calcification assign 2 points, if echogenicity cannot be judged assign 1, and if the margin cannot be judged assign 0.

LevelPointsFNA ifFollow-up ifFollow-up schedule
TR1 – benign0––none
TR2 – not suspicious2––none
TR3 – mildly suspicious3≥ 2.5 cm≥ 1.5 cm1, 3 and 5 years
TR4 – moderately suspicious4–6≥ 1.5 cm≥ 1.0 cm1, 2, 3 and 5 years
TR5 – highly suspicious≥ 7≥ 1.0 cm≥ 0.5 cmannually to 5 years
  • Size is the largest of the three dimensions. Use the same threshold for the whole nodule in mixed cystic and solid nodules.
  • With several nodules, biopsy those with the highest TI-RADS level rather than the largest, and no more than two at a time.
  • Growth on follow-up is a ≥ 20 % increase in at least two dimensions (minimum 2 mm) or a ≥ 50 % increase in volume. A nodule stable over 5 years needs no further imaging.
  • A 1-point total (possible only for a cystic nodule with a macrocalcification) is not on the ACR chart; the calculator reports TR1, which like TR2 needs neither FNA nor follow-up.

References

  1. Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG, et al. ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): White Paper of the ACR TI-RADS Committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2017;14(5):587–595. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2017.01.046
  2. Grant EG, Tessler FN, Hoang JK, et al. Thyroid Ultrasound Reporting Lexicon: White Paper of the ACR Thyroid Imaging, Reporting and Data System (TIRADS) Committee. J Am Coll Radiol. 2015;12(12 Pt A):1272–1279. doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2015.07.011
  3. Tessler FN, Middleton WD, Grant EG. Thyroid Imaging Reporting and Data System (TI-RADS): A User's Guide. Radiology. 2018;287(1):29–36. doi:10.1148/radiol.2017171240
  4. American College of Radiology. ACR TI-RADS assessment categories chart. www.acr.org/Clinical-Resources/Clinical-Tools-and-Reference/Reporting-and-Data-Systems/TI-RADS